Volume 13, Issue 2 (September- 2024)
Caspian J Dent Res 2024, 13(2): 81-87 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sarlak H, Valipour Shokuhi S, nakhostin A. ‘Intentional mistake distractions’ ; An innovative techniques for distracting children during dental treatments. Caspian J Dent Res 2024; 13 (2) :81-87
URL: http://cjdr.ir/article-1-465-en.html
URL: http://cjdr.ir/article-1-465-en.html
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran. , afr_na_sa@yahoo.com
Abstract: (1197 Views)
Introduction: Despite the introduetion of numerous behaviorel techniques, pediatric dental treatment is still a complexs challenge for the dantal team and familie. The aim of this study was to introduec the innovative method of "Intentional mistake distrcation" and to compare its effectivenes with the "common distraction" technique in the dental treatment of 3 pediatric patient.
Case description: In this case series, 3 cases, including 2 boys and 1 girl, were treated using the behavioral method “Intentional mistakes distraction” and “Conversational distraction” in a crossover (split-mouth) designs. The children's behavioral responses were assessed at the time oF local anesthetic injection and during tooth extractioin using the Sound Eye Motor (SeM) scale. The results showed that the samples had lower scores during treatment withe the “Intentional mistake distraction” method than during treatment using Conversation distraction.
Conclusion: Considering the lower behavioral responses of children when using Intentional mistakas distraction compared to Conversational distraction when applying painful stimuli, it seems that this technique can promise effective results in guiding children's behaviors.
Keywords: Behavier, Pediatric, dentistry, Anxiety, Pain.
Case description: In this case series, 3 cases, including 2 boys and 1 girl, were treated using the behavioral method “Intentional mistakes distraction” and “Conversational distraction” in a crossover (split-mouth) designs. The children's behavioral responses were assessed at the time oF local anesthetic injection and during tooth extractioin using the Sound Eye Motor (SeM) scale. The results showed that the samples had lower scores during treatment withe the “Intentional mistake distraction” method than during treatment using Conversation distraction.
Conclusion: Considering the lower behavioral responses of children when using Intentional mistakas distraction compared to Conversational distraction when applying painful stimuli, it seems that this technique can promise effective results in guiding children's behaviors.
Keywords: Behavier, Pediatric, dentistry, Anxiety, Pain.
Type of Study: Case Report |
Subject:
Pedodontics
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
