[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Publishing Ethics Issues::
Executive Board Identity::
Indexing Info::
Journal / statistics::
Social Networks::
RSS: Volume 12 - Issue 1
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Journal DOI


:: Volume 8, Issue 2 (September- 2019) ::
Caspian J Dent Res 2019, 8(2): 49-55 Back to browse issues page
Comparative evaluation of self-adhering flowable and conventional flowable composites using different adhesive systems
Maede Rahmanifard , Effat Khodadadi , Soraya Khafri , Fariba Ezoji *
,Dental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran. , f_ezoji@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (5854 Views)
Introduction: The ability to seal margins is considered as one of the best predictors for the long-term success of bonded restorations. The aim of this study was to compare microleakage in occlusal and gingival margins between cavities filled with self-adhesive flowable and conventional flowable composites using dye penetration. Composite restorations were bonded with self-etch, total etch and universal adhesives. 
Materials & Methods: In this in vitro study, 32 extracted human premolars for orthodontic  purpose were included. Class V cavities (
3×3×1.5 mm) were prepared on the facial and lingual surfaces of each tooth.  The teeth were randomly divided into four equal groups based on the type of material: Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Tokyo,Japan), Universal Scotch Bond(3M ESPE), and  Vertise Flow (Kerr Corp). Bonding agents were applied according  to the manufacturer instructions. Then the cavities of the first three groups were restored with Filtek Flow (3M ESPE,USA). In addition, the teeth were  thermocycled for 30 seconds and 1000 cycles at 5°-55°C.  Microleakage was evaluated using a stereomicroscope (X 40). Specimens were subjected to a dye leakage test. Data were  analyzed using Kruskal- Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. 
Results:   Significant difference was observed in microleakage among four groups in both occlusal and gingival levels (p≤0.05).No significant difference was found regarding microleakage between Vertise Flow, and Etch-and-rinse and Universal groups.
Conclusion:  Vertise Flow is a useful material with  adequate  marginal seal.
Keywords: Composite resins, Dental leakage, Dentin-bonding agents
Full-Text [PDF 922 kb]   (1409 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Restorative Dentistry , Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rahmanifard M, Khodadadi E, Khafri S, Ezoji F. Comparative evaluation of self-adhering flowable and conventional flowable composites using different adhesive systems. Caspian J Dent Res 2019; 8 (2) :49-55
URL: http://cjdr.ir/article-1-283-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 8, Issue 2 (September- 2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله تحقیقات دندانپزشکی کاسپین Caspian Journal of Dental Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 42 queries by YEKTAWEB 4612