Volume 8, Issue 2 (September- 2019)                   Caspian J Dent Res 2019, 8(2): 49-55 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rahmanifard M, Khodadadi E, Khafri S, Ezoji F. Comparative evaluation of self-adhering flowable and conventional flowable composites using different adhesive systems. Caspian J Dent Res 2019; 8 (2) :49-55
URL: http://cjdr.ir/article-1-283-en.html
,Dental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran. , f_ezoji@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (6159 Views)
Introduction: The ability to seal margins is considered as one of the best predictors for the long-term success of bonded restorations. The aim of this study was to compare microleakage in occlusal and gingival margins between cavities filled with self-adhesive flowable and conventional flowable composites using dye penetration. Composite restorations were bonded with self-etch, total etch and universal adhesives. 
Materials & Methods: In this in vitro study, 32 extracted human premolars for orthodontic  purpose were included. Class V cavities (
3×3×1.5 mm) were prepared on the facial and lingual surfaces of each tooth.  The teeth were randomly divided into four equal groups based on the type of material: Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Tokyo,Japan), Universal Scotch Bond(3M ESPE), and  Vertise Flow (Kerr Corp). Bonding agents were applied according  to the manufacturer instructions. Then the cavities of the first three groups were restored with Filtek Flow (3M ESPE,USA). In addition, the teeth were  thermocycled for 30 seconds and 1000 cycles at 5°-55°C.  Microleakage was evaluated using a stereomicroscope (X 40). Specimens were subjected to a dye leakage test. Data were  analyzed using Kruskal- Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. 
Results:   Significant difference was observed in microleakage among four groups in both occlusal and gingival levels (p≤0.05).No significant difference was found regarding microleakage between Vertise Flow, and Etch-and-rinse and Universal groups.
Conclusion:  Vertise Flow is a useful material with  adequate  marginal seal.
Full-Text [PDF 922 kb]   (1594 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Restorative Dentistry , Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Caspian Journal of Dental Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb