[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Publishing Ethics Issues::
Executive Board Identity::
Indexing Info::
Journal / statistics::
Social Networks::
::
..
RSS: Volume 12 - Issue 1
UniRSS
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal DOI

AWT IMAGE

..
:: Volume 3, Issue 2 ( September- 2014) ::
Caspian J Dent Res 2014, 3(2): 14-19 Back to browse issues page
Comparative evaluation of microleakage of composite restorations using fifth and seventh generations of adhesive systems
Mitra Tabari , Behnaz Esmaeili , Mona Alimohammadi *, Arash Poorsattar Bejeh Mir, Samane Gharekhani , Mahmood Hajiahmadi , Mobina Mollaei
,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad-Iran. , Mona_28y@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (12821 Views)

Introduction: Simultaneous etching of enamel and dentin using the novel generation of adhesive systems with contracted operational steps, has shown a good clinical efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of composite restorations using the V and VII generations of adhesive systems on primary teeth.

Methods: This study was performed on 45 human intact extracted primary teeth. Following class V cavity preparation, the samples were randomly divided into three groups included 15 teeth based on the type of bonding agent Single Bond 2, Clearfil S3 Bond or G Bond. After applying the bonding agents, the teeth filled with composite Z250. The microleakage values of incisal and gingival margins were separately scored by 2% basic fuchsine staining based on a 0-3 ordinal ranking system. The data were analyzed by using Kruskal Wallis and Mann_whitney U tests.

Results: In overall, the score of microleakage at incisal (0.58±0.94) and gingival (1.06±0.19) edges did not have significant difference. Also, there was no significant difference between incisal and gingival microleakage considering the different types of bonding.

Conclusion: Regarding to less operational steps and lower risk of salivary contamination, the VII generation of dentin bonding agents can be applied for filling the class V cavities of primary teeth.

Keywords: Adhesives, Composite resins, Dentin, Dental enamel
Full-Text [PDF 485 kb]   (3127 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
* Corresponding Author Address: School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad-Iran.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tabari M, Esmaeili B, Alimohammadi M, Poorsattar Bejeh Mir A, Gharekhani S, Hajiahmadi M et al . Comparative evaluation of microleakage of composite restorations using fifth and seventh generations of adhesive systems. Caspian J Dent Res 2014; 3 (2) :14-19
URL: http://cjdr.ir/article-1-118-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 2 ( September- 2014) Back to browse issues page
مجله تحقیقات دندانپزشکی کاسپین Caspian Journal of Dental Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 42 queries by YEKTAWEB 4612