[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 10, Issue 2 (September- 2021) ::
Caspian J Dent Res 2021, 10(2): 38-44 Back to browse issues page
Effect of different surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of two types of composite substructures with ceramic by resin cements
Negin Tabari , Seyedkamal Seyedmajidi , Toloo Jafari , Soraya Khafri , Homayoon Alaghehmand *
,Dental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. , halagheh@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (181 Views)
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of two types of composite substructures with Vita Mark II ceramics by resin cement.
Materials & Methods: Sixty-four substructure specimens were molded from two dual-cure composites Core.it and Build-it, equally, and cured by LED light. The specimens of each group were randomly divided into 4 subgroups (n=8) treated by one of HF acid 10%, air abrasion, Er: YAG laser, and one group without any treatment (control group), and then the specimens of each group were bonded to Vita Mark II CAD/CAM ceramic blocks using two Duo-Link and Panavia F 2.0 resin (n=4 and 20 slice in any group). Each final specimen was thermocycled between 5 °C and 55 °C for 2500 cycles and then cut by a slow speed saw to obtain 5 sticks with cross-section dimensions of about 1×1 mm². The µTBS test was done at a speed of 0.5 mm/min by Universal Testing Machine. The fracture pattern was then determined using a stereomicroscope. Statistical differences between groups were determined by one-way ANOVA using Tukey's multiple comparison tests.
Results: Among all 16 groups, the highest µTBS was observed in the group with Core.it substructure composite and Duo-link resin cement without any surface treatment and after that in the second step in build-it substructure composite group and Panavia resin cement without surface treatment. The most common fracture pattern in all groups was cohesive in resin cement (P value<0.05).
Conclusion: According to this study, composite substructure surface treatment by hydrofloridric acid, laser and air abrasion reduced µTBS between substructure- ceramic and so  is not recommended.
Keywords: Resin Cements, Ceramics, Vita Mark II
Full-Text [PDF 641 kb]   (80 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tabari N, Seyedmajidi S, Jafari T, Khafri S, Alaghehmand H. Effect of different surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of two types of composite substructures with ceramic by resin cements. Caspian J Dent Res. 2021; 10 (2) :38-44
URL: http://cjdr.ir/article-1-335-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 2 (September- 2021) Back to browse issues page
مجله تحقیقات دندانپزشکی کاسپین Caspian Journal of Dental Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4341