[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Publishing Ethics Issues::
Executive Board Identity::
Indexing Info::
Journal / statistics::
Social Networks::
RSS: Volume 12 - Issue 1
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Journal DOI


:: Volume 8, Issue 2 (September- 2019) ::
Caspian J Dent Res 2019, 8(2): 25-31 Back to browse issues page
Microleakage of two types of low-shrinkage composite resins in class II cavities on primary molars
Fatemeh Pachenari , Shima Nourmohammadi , Saber Babazadeh , Sara Maleki Kambakhsh *
,Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin,IR Iran. , smaleki@qums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (5258 Views)
Introduction: In direct aesthetic restoration, microleakage resulting from polymerization shrinkage of resin composites is still challenging. Different strategies such as maximizing the amount of inorganic filler with prepolymerized filler and different silorane matrixes have introduced to overcome this issue. The aim of this experimental study was to compare the microleakage in low-shrinkage methacrylate-based (Clear fil AP-X) and silorane-based (Filtek P90) composite resins in class II cavities on primary molar teeth.
Materials & Methods: Classic class II slot cavity preparation was done on 60 healthy human primary molars. Specimens were randomly divided into two groups. For restoring the cavity in group I: methacrylate-based composite resin, and in group II: silorane-based micro-hybrid composite resin were used. The samples were thermocycled and soaked in 2% basic fuchsine dye for 24 h. They were longitudinally sectioned and observed at the gingival margins under ×10 magnification. Scores were assigned upon the amount of dye penetration. The Mann-Whitney U-test through SPSS19.0 was used for statistical analysis of data.
Results: In both groups, the major of samples showed score 0 of dye penetration. The comparison of gingival margin leakage indicated no significant difference between two groups.
Conclusion: Both restorative materials, irrespective of their type had microleakage. Given the comparable microleakage of silorane-based (Filtek P90) and low-shrinkage methacrylate-based (Clear fil AP-X) composite resins in Class II cavities of primary molars, the clinical efficacy of both materials seems to be similar.
Keywords: Silorane resins, Methacrylates, Composite resins
Full-Text [PDF 1003 kb]   (1791 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Pedodontics
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, IR Iran.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Pachenari F, Nourmohammadi S, Babazadeh S, Maleki Kambakhsh S. Microleakage of two types of low-shrinkage composite resins in class II cavities on primary molars. Caspian J Dent Res 2019; 8 (2) :25-31
URL: http://cjdr.ir/article-1-272-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 8, Issue 2 (September- 2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله تحقیقات دندانپزشکی کاسپین Caspian Journal of Dental Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 42 queries by YEKTAWEB 4612