[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Publishing Ethics Issues::
Executive Board Identity::
Indexing Info::
Journal / statistics::
Social Networks::
RSS: Volume 12 - Issue 1
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Journal DOI


:: Volume 5, Issue 1 (March- 2016) ::
Caspian J Dent Res 2016, 5(1): 8-13 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of coronal microleakage of resin modified glass ionomer and composite resin as intra-orifice barriers in internal bleaching
Mehrdad Barekatain, Maryam Zare jahromi, Salma Habibagahi *
,Department of Operative Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan,Iran. , sal1367@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (11375 Views)

Introduction: Internal bleaching is a treatment option for wightening endodontically treated discolored teeth. Cervical resorption is one of the side effects of this method.The aim of this study was to compare the sealing ability of resin composite and light-cured resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) as intra-orifice barriers in internal bleaching.

Materials &Methods: In this study, 34 single-canal anterior teeth were used. All samples were endodontically prepared and divided into two experimental groups (n=12) and two control groups (n=5). In the experimental groups, Gutta-percha was removed up to 3 mm below the cemento enamel junction (CEJ). RMGI and composite resin was placed over gutta-percha in the experimental groups up to the level of CEJ. After 24-hours incubation period, the bleaching agent (a mixture of sodium perborate and 30% hydrogen peroxide) was placed in the access cavities. The bleaching agents were replaced every 3 days over 9 days. Then, the access cavity was filled with 2% methylene blue for 48 hours. All samples were longitudinally sectioned and the dye penetration range was evaluated using stereomicroscope. Data was statistically analyzed by using T-student test and variance analysis.

Results: The microleakage in RMGI group was 0.945mm and in composite resin group was 0.641mm. Statistically, no significant difference was observed in microleakage between the experimental groups (p=0.121).

Conclusion: Both materials can be applied as the intra-orifice barriers for internal bleaching.

Keywords: Composite resin [MeSH], Dental leakage [MeSH], Glass ionomer [MeSH], Tooth bleaching [MeSH]
Full-Text [PDF 620 kb]   (4370 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
* Corresponding Author Address: Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Barekatain M, Zare jahromi M, Habibagahi S. Comparison of coronal microleakage of resin modified glass ionomer and composite resin as intra-orifice barriers in internal bleaching. Caspian J Dent Res 2016; 5 (1) :8-13
URL: http://cjdr.ir/article-1-165-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 1 (March- 2016) Back to browse issues page
مجله تحقیقات دندانپزشکی کاسپین Caspian Journal of Dental Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 42 queries by YEKTAWEB 4612