[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Publishing Ethics Issues::
Executive Board Identity::
Indexing Info::
Journal / statistics::
Social Networks::
::
..
RSS: Volume 12 - Issue 1
UniRSS
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal DOI

AWT IMAGE

..
:: Volume 3, Issue 2 ( September- 2014) ::
Caspian J Dent Res 2014, 3(2): 20-25 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of gold standards with common histopathologic evaluations in diagnosis of oral neurofibromas in pathology department of Shiraz Dental School
Ali Dehghani Nazhvani , Zohreh Jafari Ashkavandi, Nafiseh Shamloo , Zeinab Moniri *
,School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz- Iran. , zmoniri66@gmail.com
Abstract:   (14039 Views)

Introduction: Diagnosis of neurofibroma usually is based on the specific morphology and arrangement of mesenchymal cells in routine Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) sections, and detection of mast cells supports the diagnosis. Sometimes definite diagnosis from other mesenchymal lesions may be difficult. The aim of the present study was to compare S100 expression and mast cells count (as Gold Standard) with routine histopathologic diagnosis.

Methods: In this cross-sectional analytical study, all cases of neurofibroma and compatible/ consistent with neurofibroma, that had been diagnosed in department of oral & maxillofacial pathology, school of dentistry, Shiraz, from 1986 to 2013, were enrolled. Immunohistochemistry was performed using S100 antibody and slides were stained by Giemsa. S100 labeling index, intensity and distribution as well as mast cells count were evaluated using light microscope.

Results: Mast cells were present in 97% of cases that 56.4 % showed 1-200 cells/10HPF. 82 % of cases were positive for S100 that 40.7% showed 2-30% labeling index and 70.4% had moderate intensity for S100 staining.

Conclusions: The comparison of routine histopathologic examination with gold standard method in Oral Pathology Department of Shiraz Dental School confirmed the routine histopathologic diagnosis in all cases, therefore no more evaluation may be required if a pathologist considers all routine diagnostic criteria.

Keywords: Neurofibroma, S-100 protein, Giemsa stain, Mast cells
Full-Text [PDF 621 kb]   (2904 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology
* Corresponding Author Address: School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz- Iran.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Dehghani Nazhvani A, Jafari Ashkavandi Z, Shamloo N, Moniri Z. Comparison of gold standards with common histopathologic evaluations in diagnosis of oral neurofibromas in pathology department of Shiraz Dental School. Caspian J Dent Res 2014; 3 (2) :20-25
URL: http://cjdr.ir/article-1-119-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 2 ( September- 2014) Back to browse issues page
مجله تحقیقات دندانپزشکی کاسپین Caspian Journal of Dental Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 42 queries by YEKTAWEB 4612