Volume 13, Issue 1 (March- 2024)
Caspian J Dent Res 2024, 13(1): 51-58 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.MUBABOL.HRI.REC.1401.063
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Gholamian F, Ghorbanipour R, Hajian tilaki A, Johari M, Hajian Tilaki K. Comparison Between Cranial Base Morphology measurements and Various Maxillofacial Relationships in the Sagittal Dimension in Iranian people. Caspian J Dent Res 2024; 13 (1) :51-58
URL: http://cjdr.ir/article-1-440-en.html
URL: http://cjdr.ir/article-1-440-en.html
Farhan Gholamian 
, Reza Ghorbanipour * , Arefe Hajian tilaki , Maryam Johari , Karimollah Hajian Tilaki
, Reza Ghorbanipour * , Arefe Hajian tilaki , Maryam Johari , Karimollah Hajian Tilaki
Oral Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, I.R. Iran , dr_ghorbanipour@yahoo.com
Abstract: (510 Views)
Introduction: The comparison between the morphology of cranial base and different jaw relationships helps to increase awareness about the way of maxillofacial development and its relationship with the types of skeletal malocclusion. This study aims to examine the relationship between the morphology of the cranial base and different maxillofacial relationships in the sagittal dimension.
Materials & Methods: For this study, 180 lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected from the records of patients aged 18-25 years. The patients were categorized into three equal groups based on skeletal relationship distributions. Linear and angular cephalometric variables were measured and recorded.
Results: There were significant differences between the study groups in certain linear and angular variables. In particular, differences were seen in the S-N (p = 0.049), Ar-ANS (p = 0.001) and Ar-Pog (p = 0.001) for linear variables, and in saddle angle (p = 0.006) and gonial angle (p = 0.001) for angular variables.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the morphology of the cranial base is different in the jaw relations in the sagittal dimension, and there is a possibility that the pattern of the morphology of the cranial base determines the type of jaw relations in the future.
Keywords: Cranial Base, Cephalometry, Maxillofacial
Materials & Methods: For this study, 180 lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected from the records of patients aged 18-25 years. The patients were categorized into three equal groups based on skeletal relationship distributions. Linear and angular cephalometric variables were measured and recorded.
Results: There were significant differences between the study groups in certain linear and angular variables. In particular, differences were seen in the S-N (p = 0.049), Ar-ANS (p = 0.001) and Ar-Pog (p = 0.001) for linear variables, and in saddle angle (p = 0.006) and gonial angle (p = 0.001) for angular variables.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the morphology of the cranial base is different in the jaw relations in the sagittal dimension, and there is a possibility that the pattern of the morphology of the cranial base determines the type of jaw relations in the future.
Keywords: Cranial Base, Cephalometry, Maxillofacial
Type of Study: Research Paper |
Subject:
Orthodontics
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
