Volume 13, Issue 2 (4-2024)
Caspian J Dent Res 2024, 13(2): 75-81 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.MUI.RESEARCH.REC.1402.007
School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of medical science, Esfahan, Iran , sabateimuri@gmail.com
Abstract: (551 Views)
Introduction: The use of mouthwashes is an effective method of combating tooth decay. The anti-caries effect of mouthwashes depends on the amount of fluoride they contain. Knowing the ingredients of mouthwashes can help users to choose the right products. The aim of this study was to determine the fluoride concentration in the mouthwashes.
Materials & Methods: In this in vitro study, the mouthwashes available on the market were investigated. 18 bottles of mouthwashes from six brands (Misswake, Zenon, Bencer, Dent-a-xyl, Vi-One, and Plastrin) were analyzed using ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) according to the standard addition method (direct potentiometry) to examine. A one-sample T-test was used to analyze the data. A value of p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The results showed a significant difference between the measured values and the information on the label of the bottles. The mean fluoride concentration of 6 mouthwashes was measured (Misswake: 74.08±27.89 ppm , Zenon: 89.12±4.48 ppm, Bencer: 774.31±19.37 ppm, Dent-a-xyle: 861.44±31.54 ppm, Plastrin: 122.01±2.24 ppm and Vi-One: 151.02±101.47 ppm). The amount of fluoride in the Bencer and Dent-a-xyl mouthwashes was sufficient to prevent tooth decay, despite the different amounts indicated on the bottle.
Conclusion: The amount of fluoride released in the mouthwashes did not match the amount of fluoride claimed by the manufacturer. There is a need to monitor and improve the methods used to evaluate fluoride. In addition, adequate and accurate information should be provided on the bottles of mouthwashes and further research is needed on the amount of fluoride in mouthwashes.
Keywords: Mouthwashes, Sodium fluoride, Ion-selective electrodes (ISE), Dental caries.
Materials & Methods: In this in vitro study, the mouthwashes available on the market were investigated. 18 bottles of mouthwashes from six brands (Misswake, Zenon, Bencer, Dent-a-xyl, Vi-One, and Plastrin) were analyzed using ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) according to the standard addition method (direct potentiometry) to examine. A one-sample T-test was used to analyze the data. A value of p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The results showed a significant difference between the measured values and the information on the label of the bottles. The mean fluoride concentration of 6 mouthwashes was measured (Misswake: 74.08±27.89 ppm , Zenon: 89.12±4.48 ppm, Bencer: 774.31±19.37 ppm, Dent-a-xyle: 861.44±31.54 ppm, Plastrin: 122.01±2.24 ppm and Vi-One: 151.02±101.47 ppm). The amount of fluoride in the Bencer and Dent-a-xyl mouthwashes was sufficient to prevent tooth decay, despite the different amounts indicated on the bottle.
Conclusion: The amount of fluoride released in the mouthwashes did not match the amount of fluoride claimed by the manufacturer. There is a need to monitor and improve the methods used to evaluate fluoride. In addition, adequate and accurate information should be provided on the bottles of mouthwashes and further research is needed on the amount of fluoride in mouthwashes.
Keywords: Mouthwashes, Sodium fluoride, Ion-selective electrodes (ISE), Dental caries.
Type of Study: Research Paper |
Subject:
Oral Health
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |